WWW.TULOK.NET

www.tulok.net : Earlier Entries
Equinoxically Speaking
October 11, 2004 11:59 pm
 
My summer officially ended at 10:28 this evening: I flipped the switch on the central air unit from 'cool' to 'heat'. Indoor thermometer is showing three degrees warmer but, sitting much closer to the vent than the thermometer, it feels more like ten.
We had a nice steady light rain for most of the day yesterday. The hard rain only came through town twice: while I was going to work and while I was coming home.

And just like the last time I was driving home from work on I-44 during a heavy rain, I'm witness to another spinout. This time it was in front of me on the west end of the Arkansas River bridge. Car in the left lane suddenly veered to the right, hit the right-side concrete barrier, and spun back into the middle lane. Fortunately for me, I was only about halfway across the bridge when it happened, so I was able to slow down in plenty of time: he was already stopped by the time I got past him. Fortunately for him, the vehicle beside me on the bridge was an ambulance.

Man, I just gotta stop taking I-44 when it rains.


Channel 2 reported just over six inches of rain Thursday evening during the massive storm that came through, another inch on Sunday, and thanks to the remnants of Tropical Storm Matthew, another 2.33 inches today, for a South Peoria total of 9.73", just since Thursday!
It appears Check Shopping Day will become a thing of the past. According to this article, check debits will quickly be processed as quickly as debit card payments. Before, if you knew the money was going to be in the bank Friday you could write checks when you went shopping on Thursday, knowing they wouldn't make it back to the bank before Friday at the earliest. Not any more. If the money's not in there on Thursday, the check'll bounce.

Just another way for the vaunted Bush Administration to stick it to the little guy who they've forced to live paycheck-to-paycheck.


And since some people I currently work with read this site from time to time, I'll close tonight with this: my gang (we're called "The Detonators" because the area we sit in is designated C4) is currently the best thing, sometimes the only thing, I like about my job. I am so stressed out on my way in, having to deal with irate customer, even more irate installers, and knowing that one accidental slip of the tongue at the wrong time can get you booted out the door permanently. The fact that wasn't even granted an interview for the one job I wanted more than any other out there didn't help matters, either.

But when I see my pals, I feel so much better. Please don't take this the wrong way, but when I see that the rest of you are as miserable as I am at work, it makes me feel so much better about myself. I know I'm not alone.

I realize that didn't come out right. I really love you guys.
 
When I Think About Things, I Jinx Myself
October 13, 2004 12:02 pm
 
By discussing "The Detonators" in the last entry, I have apparently jinxed myself and started the final self-destruct sequence for the gang. We were told yesterday that, in order to better facilitate peak call center periods, everybody's work times have been changed by anywhere from 15 minutes to two hours. In our group's case, it's the latter: we will now be coming in and leaving two hours later than we are now.

For the two of us in the group without kids, the change is not that big of a deal; a bit inconvenient, but nothing we can't handle. For everyone else in the group, this shift means not being able to spend any time in the evening with their kids: by the time they get home, their kids would likely already be asleep. If they can't swap shifts with someone in another group, they'll have to quit & find work elsewhere. Expect a very high turnover rate out there.


About the only good thing that's happened to me lately is with this site: according to a web site that checks the popularity of other web sites (for privacy reasons, not gonna say which site it is), the tulok.net domain, which includes both this page and my Roadklahoma site, is currently the 661,815th most popular domain in the entire Internet. Granted that doesn't sound like a very popular site, but given I was in the 3,000,000 range just a couple of months ago I think it's a pretty darn good number. Given that the official tulsa.com site is currently only ranked #1,221,832, and my brother-in-law's tulok.com page is #2,475,864, I think the site's doin' just fine.

Checking around, just noticed that my site is more popular than Channel 41's (#2,464,787), and it's pretty obvious that they've got a professional web designer working for them. Another sign that life just isn't fair: these web designers can make good money, and here I am barely scraping by.
 
Can't Get It Out of My Head
October 16, 2004 11:33 am
 
A one-hit wonder that went to #3 on the charts back in 1982, Charlene's "I've Never Been to Me", is the current song that's stuck in my head and doesn't want to escape. For those of you who've never heard of the song, consider yourself lucky. For those who remember it, this reminder is my misery-loves-company attempt to get it stuck in your heads as well. If you need a little assistance in remembering, here's the lyrics.
 
They're Trying to Drive Me Away, Ha-Ha!
October 21, 2004 11:54 pm
 
Just before our weekend started Tuesday, The Detonators were told that none of us were working to expectations. Based on our time on--and off--the phone, and more importantly to us, based on nothing else, we are supposed to be at a certain threshold. None of us have reached that level, so we now have to go into retraining in some sort of attempt to raise our numbers.

Simply put, if all they care about are the phone numbers, and nothing else is being taken into account, then all the company cares about is quantity, and they care very little about quality. Oh, sure, there's a Quality Assurance group who monitor occasional calls, and as far as that end of our performance is concerned, for the most part we're doing magnificently. We're just supposed to be doing that magnificent work a whole lot faster.

Well by and large, we quickly discovered it doesn't work that way. You can either do the work fast and slipshod, skipping several steps, or you can do it at a methodical pace and get it right. When you factor in the several restrictions they've placed on us (as, for example, having to put a customer on hold in order to get permission to call another department that has to take over the job, even though we know full well they have to do it because we don't have the ability to, despite the fact that putting a customer on hold counts against us), it becomes virtually impossible to work at the level they supposedly expect. If we go any faster, our quality will suffer. But they won't let us keep going at our current rate. Catch-22.

I think I've figured it out, though. It's so simple when you think about it:

They're trying to get rid of us!

By first moving us to an unreasonable shift time, then by trying to make us work at an unreasonable rate, they're forcing us to either quit or be fired. Either way, we wouldn't be there long enough for them to worry about having to pay us for vacation time, or pay for our insurance. If most of the staff don't stay that long, saves the company a lot of bucks.

So, even though I'm going to stick it out for as long as they'll let me, I am actively back to looking for something else. We were promised that promotions would be easy to come by, yet none of us can even get an interview for another position. No promotion, no increase in pay. And frankly, I'm barely getting through the house payment and utility bills. Other stuff that needs to be done is falling by the wayside.

  • I haven't completely filled my gas tank in nearly three months. Most of the time I stop after adding five gallons.
  • Just had the car looked at, and while everything is OK for now, the transmission fluid needs to be completely replaced, as does the front strut. Although neither problem needs to be fixed quickly, it will need to be done sooner than later.
  • My toilet's tank has been leaking since May. The seal at the bottom of the tank is no longer a tight one, so in order to flush I have to refill the tank manually using a pitcher and water from the tub. I either need new componets for the tank or, given it's older than me, a whole new toilet. Either way, can't afford it.
  • All six of my cats need their shots, and the two kittens still need to be fixed. Not having the money to do that is making me feel like a bad father.
  • And, the office chair I'm sitting in while typing this is about to give out on me. Need another one before I have to go back to using a 40-year old kitchen chair, the only other chair in the house that can be used at this spot.

Most of you who read this know me and know what I'm able to do, so if any of you hear of any job opportunities you think I could handle, I'd be greatly appreciative.
 
Bi-annual Hell Week, a.k.a. The Elections
October 28, 2004 4:17 pm
 
Well, it's an even-numbered year and we're approaching the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, meaning it's once again time to vote a bunch of idiots into office. So, here's my personal bi-annual recommendation of how to vote. Let's start with the State Questions:


S.Q. 705 & 706: State Lottery. Well, given that two years ago the primary reason I voted for Henry over Largent for Governor was because Henry wanted a lottery to help fund education, pretty obvious which way I'm going on this one.

I participate in the lotteries whenever I go to Kansas or Missouri; at least I did when I could afford the gas to get there, so it's been awhile. And to those who say it will make the poor poorer because they'll be spending all their money on lottery tickets: if it isn't lottery tickets it'd be something else. The ones who would fall under that category are probably that way because of reckless spending. In the end a few more lottery tickets a week won't make that much difference. Yes to both questions.


S.Q. 707: Near as I can figure, this is basically the state's version of the Vision 2525 plan Tulsa voters passed two years ago. Allows other cities and towns to do the same thing without having to go to a vote of the people.

Not sure on this one, but I'd prefer each municipality do their own voting on this kind of issue, like Tulsa did. No.


S.Q. 708: Rainy Day Fund. As it stands now, the Legislature can spend half of the Rainy Day Fund on anything they want, regardless of whether or not it's a Rainy Day issue. Among other things, this SQ would reduce that capability to only 25%. That alone will have me voting Yes.
S.Q. 711: Bans Gay Marriages. Hoo-boy, where do I start? First of all, I've looked. There's nothing in the Bible that says gays can't marry. It says that gays can't be. That they shouldn't exist at all. Well, nobody's gonna be able to stop that from happening, and this is not the kind of issue where you should settle for the next best thing. Besides, the Bible also says bigamy and slavery are fine and dandy ideas, and occasionally didn't frown upon a little incest. Times change!

My main point of contention on this issue is exactly the same as it is on abortions: while I'm personally not crazy about the idea, since it doesn't affect me nor anyone I know directly, and likely never will, it's none of my concern! This isn't about stopping criminal activity or preventing some sort of disease. This is an unwelcome and unnecessary intrusion into another person's lifestyle choice. It's discrimination, pure and simple.

Allow this, and who'll be next? The elderly? Families with more than 2.8 children? Marriages of people whose ages are over 20 years apart? Left-handed people?! Release this genie from the bottle and you might as well uncork all the other bottles now, cause you'll be releasing a massive can of worms faster than I can mix my metaphors.

VOTE NO!!!

(And to those who are wondering at what point during the pregnancy abortion should be illegal: the point at which the fetus can survive outside of the mother's body unassisted, basically meaning during the third trimester. If it can survive on its own, it's alive.)


S.Q. 712: Electronic Gaming at Racetracks. Bill would permit it at Remington Park, Will Rogers Downs and Blue Ribbon Downs, but not at Tulsa's Fair Meadows? That alone has me voting No.
S.Q. 713: Tobacco Tax Increase. All of my smoker friends will disagree on this one, but I'm voting Yes, mainly because the primary sponsors of the Anti-713 campaign are tobacco giants Philip Morris & R.J. Reynolds, who have absolutely no business interfering in state politics.
S.Q. 714: Freezes the property tax on seniors under a certain income. Basically California's Proposition 13 for the elderly, and a very good idea. Yes.
S.Q. 715: Completely exempts property taxes on Permanently Disabled Veterans. A no-brainer. Yes.
U.S. Senator: Brad Carson vs. Tom Coburn. I'm so sick of the mudslinging between these two I wish there was a third candidate. I'd even prefer "None of the Above". But my final choice is based on the end of one of the Republican Party's commercials:
A vote for Brad Carson is a vote against President Bush.
Works for me. Carson.
House District 1: John Sullivan vs. Doug Dodd: Granted given my satellite TV I don't watch much local programming, so I haven't seen all of the commercials our there. While I have seen several pro-Dodd commercials, as well as anti-Dodd ones, I have yet to see a single pro-Sullivan ad. And of the two anti-Sullivan ads I know of, Sullivan's claims that they are baldfaced lies are themselves baldfaced lies, at least, according to the Truth Tests performed by KOTV (click here for the results of the first ad and here for the second.)

Sullivan's been in Congress a little over two years and he still can't get his lies straight? No, thanks. Dodd.


President: Bush vs. Kerry. I think my choice here is pretty obvious. A president who deliberately lied about facts so he could start a war to capture one terrorist leader in order to divert attention from the fact that he couldn't locate another, all the while ignoring the economy. I was merely joking with the play on words at the time, but four years later it has become painfully obvious that my statement was true: we wound up inaugurating "the evil of two lessers!"

It all comes down the basic re-election question: "Are you better off now than you were four years ago?" Well, thanks to the economy, I'm making around half of what I was earning in 2000. Thanks to the so-called War on Terrorism, I do not feel nearly as safe as I did in 2000. And thanks to the last presidential election, I have come to the conclusion that nepotism is more important than anything else in life, and given I'm an only child, that means I'm gonna wind up with less and less if this administration is allowed to continue.

Kerry not only should win, if this country is even to have a chance of recovering from its tailspin, Kerry must win!

Although I must admit, as dangerous as Bush is, he is not the most dangerous American alive. That honor goes to Ralph Nader: if not for his delusions of grandeur we likely wouldn't be in the mess we're in now.

And once again, all opinions are mine, I'm not looking for differing ones, nor will I post them. If you don't like them, get your own weblog!
 
The 269th Sign of the Apocalypse
October 29, 2004 11:37 am
 
Mattel has come out with an entire line of Barbie products...for your cat!
 

September 2004 «  » November 2004
My 6½ Cents
Previous Blogged Entries

August 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002

email